Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast |
Download Episode (16.1 MB, 17.7 minutes)
Show notes:
Microbe of the episode: Equine arteritis virus
News item
Journal Paper:
Zhao EM, Zhang Y, Mehl J, Park H, Lalwani MA, Toettcher JE, Avalos JL. 2018. Optogenetic regulation of engineered cellular metabolism for microbial chemical production. Nature 555:683–687.
Post questions or comments here or email to bacteriofiles@gmail.com. Thanks for listening!
Subscribe: Apple Podcasts, RSS, Google Play. Support the show at Patreon, or check out the show at Twitter or Facebook.
Episode outline:
- Background: Lots of promise in using microbes as tiny factories
- Can transform lots of things into lots of other things
- Medicine, fuels, other useful chemicals
- With high value products like drugs, don't need too much efficiency
- But fuels and such, need to optimize
- Reduce cost of inputs, maximize outputs
- Essential to balance metabolism
- So intermediates don't build up and cause bottleneck or side paths or toxicity
- Tight control required, but tricky to achieve
- Can set up so cells regulate engineered metabolism automatically
- Not always ideal; requires different steps simultaneously
- Alternative is having multiple steps
- Build up precursors in one step, then change to next to convert
- Helpful to make inducible, eg by chemical addition or temperature or something
- What’s new: Now, scientists publishing in Nature have developed a system in yeast for producing valuable chemicals by controlling the cells with light!
- Light is cheap and compatible with most processes
- Easy to add or remove
- Methods: System called optogenetics
- Uses blue light-sensitive transcription factor from microbe Erythrobacter litoralis
- Aerobic, marine phototroph
- And promoter that protein activates expression from, then put whatever gene
- Tried GFP first to test
- Could get 43x more fluorescence with constant light than dark
- Or less, if desired, with pulses
- Similar expression to common constitutive promoter ADH1 - maximized
- Then on to application
- Yeast growing on sugar – two pathways after glycolysis
- Convert to ethanol if too much – fermentation
- Otherwise respiration – break all the way down to CO2
- Here wanted other products, so needed to inhibit ethanol production
- Used optogenetic process to control
- Set up pyruvate decarboxylation control with light
- Takes glycolysis product and directs to growth/ethanol
- Here, can turn on with light, turn off without
- So when growing yeast, turn on so they can grow well
- Then move to dark vessel to make product
- Worked out well – strain could grow ~90% of normal rate in light
- If grown with ethanol/glycerol, didn't need light – independent of this enzyme
- Then optimize for desired product
- Here, lactate or isobutanol
- Former: precursor chemical and such, easier to test, low toxicity.
- Latter also good chemical, and drop-in biofuel
- Combine two different light mechanisms – one to shut off and one to turn on
- For shutting off, have light activate protein that shuts off another protein
- Lactate worked well, production increased
- Isobutanol – multiple enzymes in pathway but only regulated first
- Others produced constitutively, but no precursors to act one
- Tried varying amounts of light and dark culturing and cell density when switching to max
- More cells seems better, but only to a point; too many and they get unhealthy, can't produce
- Gave 2% glucose – 20 grams in a liter of medium
- Got up to 34 milligrams isobutanol per gram glucose
- Theoretical max of ethanol is 511 mg, usually more like half that
- But butanol has 4 carbons instead of 2, so expect more like 100mg/g
- Then tried 15% glucose, got 8 mg/g; less glucose consumed, metabolism stalled
- Thought maybe cell energy (electron carriers) ran out in dark; so pulsed light to recharge a bit
- Keep metabolism going
- Got production up to 22 mg/g, along with other good biofuel byproduct
- Still less yield than with 2% glucose, but much higher final concentration
- Then tried in fermenters, with dark phase a fed-batch
- instead of all glucose at once, pump in gradually over time as needed
- Got up to 53mg/g isobutanol and 14 mg/g other byproduct
- Summary: Engineering yeast to control their metabolism with light exposure, can greatly increase their ability to produce isobutanol biofuel instead of ethanol, more cells, or other products
- Applications and implications: Butanol and other advanced biofuels important to develop
- Ethanol is valuable as gas additive; cleaner, cheaper, higher octane
- But only works up to certain concentration, only in certain engines (and only gas)
- Also lower energy density
- Butanol can replaced gas directly, works in all gas engines
- And other compounds also good
- And other engines need other fuels, like jets/diesel/ships
- So developing tech to produce them commercially is important
- What do I think: Cells in nature optimize their own metabolic regulation
- In nature, turn on best enzymes at right times/levels to maximize survival in environment
- Not always best for what we want them to do
- Can modify environment to encourage other production
- But for optimum production, add/modify enzymes
- And even better, add ability to regulate easily, like here
- Microbes' cellular chemistry will be more and more important for sustainable production
No comments:
Post a Comment