Beauvericin By Yu et al. 2017, Nat Commun CC-BY 4.0 |
Download Episode (8.7 MB, 9.5 minutes)
Show notes:
Microbe of the episode: Nerine virus X
News item
Journal Paper:
Yu D, Xu F, Zhang S, Zhan J. 2017. Decoding and reprogramming fungal iterative nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Nat Commun 8:ncomms15349.
Other interesting stories:
Post questions or comments here or email to bacteriofiles@gmail.com. Thanks for listening!
Subscribe: iTunes, RSS, Google Play. Support the show at Patreon, or check out the show at Twitter or Facebook.
Episode outline:
- Background: Fungi often pretty weird (see ep 279)
- Challenge many things we think are universal about life
- One thing like that is Central Dogma
- DNA transcribed to RNA, then that translated to protein by ribosomes
- Genetic code and codons that code for amino acids that ribosomes assemble into chain
- Though some viruses start from RNA, and some reverse process, etc
- But some fungi defy dogma in another way: non-ribosomal peptides or NRPs
- Put together amino acids into small chains/rings with non-ribosomal peptide synthetases
- NRPSs
- Variety of effects from resulting molecules; one is penicillin
- Some other antibacterial or function as anti-cancer or insecticidal
- Bacteria have NRPs too
- So lots of interesting biochemistry and potential usefulness
- Interest in producing compounds more easily/cheaply
- What’s new: Now, scientists publishing in Nature Communications have studied these enzymes to understand how they work, and possibly how to modify them to produce different useful products!
- In fungus: Beauveria bassiana
- Produces beauvericin and bassianolide
- Rather pretty chemical structures, lacey rings, at least drawn flat
- NRPSs are big enzymes with multiple domains, like assembly line
- Product gets modified in one then passed to next, etc
- But overall function not well understood
- Methods: First took synthetase genes and expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
- Not too easy, they’re gigantic; hard to PCR, hard to synthesize
- Purified and tested
- Given right substrates, produced correct product
- Mutated single aminos of proteins to see how product changed
- Figure out which model of process was correct
- moving from one domain to other or building on one
- Some domains apparently redundant; protein can still produce if one or other is removed
- Tho removing one reduces production a lot more than other
- Conclusion is that the moving between domains model is more likely
- One mystery maybe solved
- Another is what another kind of domain does
- Produced it in isolated form and observed what it did to substrate
- Created certain kind of bond
- Or removed from rest of protein and observed what resulted
- Some resulted in no protein at all; required for production
- Also tried creating chimera enzymes of 2 synthetases
- Created new products different from either enzyme
- Similar in monomer structure to one but similar in length to other
- Thus discovered which section determines length
- Summary: Broke down functions of different sections of fungal enzymes producing useful compounds
- Applications and implications: Easier/cheaper to produce various useful compounds
- Medications, etc
- Some already produced are interesting; others could be designed
- Pretty difficult to produce synthetically
- What do I think: Interesting to have peptides not put together by ribosome
- But makes sense, no reason why not
- Wonder how synthetases evolved
- Good to understand how enzymes work in general; more potential for design
No comments:
Post a Comment